There was a new study that tested phred against 3700 data and even
untrained it perfomed quite well up until very high quality bases (30).
Sorry I don't have the URL here, but I'm at GSAC and a colleague
who attended the 3700 users meeting was talking about TraceTuner today.
i'm sure you'll get more responses.
-James
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, He, Lei (SEA) wrote:
> We've heard that Phred isn't optimized to do base calling for 3700 output
> files, rather TraceTurner from Paracel is a better base called and QA tool.
> I'd like to solicit any input you may have based on your experiences with
> either one or both of these products.
>
> Thank you very much,
> Lei.
>
> Lei C. He
> Supervisor, Sequencing/Genomics
> Celltech Chiroscience, Inc.
> Tel: (425) 489 8079
> Fax: (425) 415 8250
>
>
>
> The information contained in this email is intended for the
> personal and confidential use of the addressee only. It may
> also be privileged information. If you are not the intended
> recipient then you are hereby notified that you have received
> this document in error and that any review, distribution or
> copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify Celltech
> Group immediately on:
>
> +44 (0)1753 534655, or email 'is@celltech.co.uk'
>
> Celltech Group plc
> 216 Bath Road, Slough, SL1 4EN, Berkshire, UK
>
> Registered Office as above. Registered in England No. 2159282
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 20 2000 - 11:12:13 EDT