To the person who is hiding behind the anonymity of the ombudsman:
Dear ..........
Before lecturing me you might perhaps have read my message completely -- the
reason that I'm looking for a glossary is that I have to familiarize support
people with some of the typical terms used in Proteomics. It is not that I'm
lazy or anything, but I know about this training since exactly two days and
have to perform this coming Monday -- establishing a glossary that already
might exist somewhere else might in such a case not make the most sense when
I have to prepare a lot of other training material.
For once that I ask for advice -- many participants of this bulletin board
may know that I readily contribute in areas of my expertise (miniaturized LC
applications in protein/peptide separations) -- and for that one time I get
anonymously talked down.
Is that really in the spirit of this bulletin board where we try to mutually
exchange information and help us out. Is that tone really appropriate. I
have observed a degradation in cooperative spirit and friendliness over the
last months.
Let's do something to revive this bulletin board to its useful value as a
tool.
AND YES: I THANK EVERYBODY WHO GIVE ME USEFUL INFORMATION.
This is my private opinion an not related to my company, therefore I just
sign with my name without my usual signature.
Regards: Jean-Pierre Salzmann
> From: Ombudsman account for AECOM <ombudsmn@aecom.yu.edu>
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:55:31 -0500 (EST)
> To: Recipients of ABRF List <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
> Subject: Glossary of Terms for Proteomics (fwd)
>
>
> Perhaps (a good old fashioned approach) reviewing several publications in the
> field of proteomics would provide you with the information you are seeking. A
> review of the literature will most certainly provide you with much more than
> terminology.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 09 2000 - 09:18:08 EST