Dear Ombudsman(person),
I also take offence to this misuse use of YOUR power. If this is not the
lowest form of spam/anonymity I do not know what is.
Whenever I put a comment to this board, I clearly identify myself, without
ambiguity.
The concept of the glossary, I think, came across well and I even added
query with regards to .....logues. This forum was quite useful to me, and I
think to others also.
The exact responsibility of your office is not clear to me and I will accept
almost whatever you do but I must take offence to the event below.
Respectfully,
alex
Alexander Bell
Anat and Cell Biol
McGill University
Montreal Quebec Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Pierre Salzmann" <jps@lcpackingsusa.com>
To: "Recipients of ABRF List" <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Glossary of Terms for Proteomics
> To the person who is hiding behind the anonymity of the ombudsman:
>
> Dear ..........
>
> Before lecturing me you might perhaps have read my message completely --
the
> reason that I'm looking for a glossary is that I have to familiarize
support
> people with some of the typical terms used in Proteomics. It is not that
I'm
> lazy or anything, but I know about this training since exactly two days
and
> have to perform this coming Monday -- establishing a glossary that already
> might exist somewhere else might in such a case not make the most sense
when
> I have to prepare a lot of other training material.
>
> For once that I ask for advice -- many participants of this bulletin board
> may know that I readily contribute in areas of my expertise (miniaturized
LC
> applications in protein/peptide separations) -- and for that one time I
get
> anonymously talked down.
>
> Is that really in the spirit of this bulletin board where we try to
mutually
> exchange information and help us out. Is that tone really appropriate. I
> have observed a degradation in cooperative spirit and friendliness over
the
> last months.
>
> Let's do something to revive this bulletin board to its useful value as a
> tool.
>
> AND YES: I THANK EVERYBODY WHO GIVE ME USEFUL INFORMATION.
>
> This is my private opinion an not related to my company, therefore I just
> sign with my name without my usual signature.
>
> Regards: Jean-Pierre Salzmann
>
>
> > From: Ombudsman account for AECOM <ombudsmn@aecom.yu.edu>
> > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:55:31 -0500 (EST)
> > To: Recipients of ABRF List <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
> > Subject: Glossary of Terms for Proteomics (fwd)
> >
> >
> > Perhaps (a good old fashioned approach) reviewing several publications
in the
> > field of proteomics would provide you with the information you are
seeking. A
> > review of the literature will most certainly provide you with much more
than
> > terminology.
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 08:37:58 EST