Sure Millie, you could do that...but, I'd also add an
equivalent amount (with respect to the AA
stoichiometry) HOBt to minimize the potential of
racimization.
Something else you might try is to add the
AA/Activators to the deprotected resin in DMF/DCM
(9:1), then let shake for about 5 minutes, THEN, add
your DIEA. Other things you might try are
TFFH...makes the acid flouride in-situ, even a double
coupling may be better using your first initial
conditions than trying a 'hotter' reagent that might
cause you problems down the road. I trust you are
doing a Kaiser test (ninhydrin) for completeness of
coupling prior to moving on (absence of blueness).
My $0.02 ($0.03 Canadian)
Regards,
Steven Johnson, B.S. Chem.
Research Associate
Process Development, Chemistry
Biomeasure, Inc. Milford, MA, USA
--- mcada002@mc.duke.edu wrote:
>
>
> Anyone having experience with both activators:
>
> Please respond per your experience in terms of
> completeness of coupling. I
> understand that HATU is "faster" in coupling than
> HBTU. But...is it better in
> that you get a higher percentage of sites coupled
> with the amino acid in
> question.
>
> I have experienced incomplete coupling of the first
> amino acid onto
> Fmoc-L-Lys-(e-BiotinLC)0OH to Rink amide MBHA resin.
> This is the first time I
> have used this resin and I am told the coupling may
> be difficult. So, I'm
> thinking I should couple the first amino acid onto
> the resin overnite. And I'm
> wondering if I would be better off using HATU
> instead of HBTU?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Millie McAdams
> HHMI Biopolymer Facility @ DUMC
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 12:44:47 EST