Mark,
Perfectly agree!
On many ocasions I have noted questions (posted by others), and have been
waiting ... but the answers never came.
One reason I believe might be that most members simply hit "REPLY",
while "REPLY TO ALL" would include all recepients.
Lyuben
Lyuben Marekov
NIH/NIAMS
"This mechanism permits us all to share in the knowledge and amplifies
and
enriches the discussion."
This is a sentence taken from the ABRF Electronic Discussion Group
description found at the ABRF website.
All the responses to my recent query regarding autodigestion were sent
directly to me and, I assume given Jay
Gambee's thanks to his responders concerning VP-Cys elution position,
all
those responses (save Linda's) went
directly to him.
If people continue to insist on replying directly the usefulness of this
medium is greatly reduced. Once again, I
am asking the membership to consider posting their replies to the full
discussion group. If anonymity is an issue,
please take advantage of the Ombudsman veil.
For anyone who is a fan of the movie Mystery Men: " Rage
subsiding" Regards, Mark.
Mark W. Crankshaw
Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Laboratories
Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8103
St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
voice: (314) 362-0285
FAX: (314) 362-4698
email: crank@pcg.wustl.edu
web: http://pharmdec.wustl.edu/pnacl.home.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 13:03:34 EST