Re: procise setup

From: David A. Schooley (schooley@med.unr.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 17:21:53 EDT


<x-flowed>At 11:26 AM -0400 6/1/01, DavidS@imclone.com wrote:

Dave-
        I like to pinch pennies on sequencer supplies too- had a
special Supelco N2 purifier for our Porton sequencer, which went
through a tank of N2 every couple weeks, runnning or not. This is
simply not worth it with the Procise- we get about 18 months out of a
single Argon tank.

>Hi, I was wondering if there is any reason I shouldn't replace our Argon
>tank with high purity Nitrogen. Will the money I save be spent replacing
>contaminated reagents? Will my analyses be affected significantly? We are
>not doing incredibly low level detection so I'm thinking this switch should
>be acceptable.
>Thanks,
>Dave Sargent
>Protein Chemistry
>ImClone Systems Inc.
>davids@imclone.com

David

-- 
David A. Schooley
Dept. of Biochemistry/330
Univ. of Nevada
Reno, NV 89557
schooley@unr.edu
tel: (775) 784-4136; fax (775) 784-1419
NOTE NEW AREA CODE: Mandatory after 5/15/99

</x-flowed>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 21 2001 - 14:17:19 EST