Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 15:02:01 -0700 (MST)
From: "Terry Mulcahy 272-5792; fax 272-9107" <TMULCAHY@medusa.unm.edu>
Subject: DNA Synthesis
To: ABRFhyp@cco.caltech.edu
Return-path: <abrf-request@aecom.yu.edu>
Received: from alsys1.aecom.yu.edu (alsys1.aecom.yu.edu)
by MEDUSA.UNM.EDU (PMDF V5.0-5 #5028) id <01I5SJ00N6ZE002IBZ@MEDUSA.UNM.EDU>;
Tue, 11 Jun 1996 18:27:08 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alsys1.aecom.yu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3)
id SAA09064 for abrf-out; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 18:48:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wisc.edu (wisc.edu [128.104.30.27])
by alsys1.aecom.yu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA09054 for
<abrf@aecom.yu.edu>; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 18:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by wisc.edu; id AA27398; 5.57/37; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 17:55:54 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 17:49:29 -0500
From: cwscherr@facstaff.wisc.edu (Chris Scherrer)
Subject: Re: DNASYN: LV-40 and LV-200
Sender: Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities
<abrf-request@aecom.yu.edu>
To: Recipients of ABRF List <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
Errors-to: abrf-request@aecom.yu.edu
Message-id: <v01540b04ade3a7783ae4@[144.92.94.143]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: bulk
Old-To: abrf@aecom.yu.edu
>Hi Barbara:
> We use the LV 200 nmol columns of ABI and are very pleased with the
>quality of oligo and reagent savings. We QC every oligo we make and thus know
>that the quality is good. We see no point in using the LV 40nmol columns
>because the savings are not substantial in our situation. For specific
>information, please email to Glenn at oligo@fccc.edu. We make about 500 oligos
>a month.
> Tony
>>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Anthony Yeung, Ph.D. Phone: (215) 728-2488
>Member FAX: (215) 728-3647
>Fox Chase Cancer Center Internet: AT_Yeung@fccc.edu
>7701 Burholme Ave.
>Philadelphia. PA 19111
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony,
I estimated the cost difference per base to be only 10 cents for our
facility. The delivery time for the LV-40 is 0.2 sec and only 0.6 sec for
the LV-200. If I remember correctly, the LV-200 procedure actually uses
less Acetonitrile which also brings down the cost per base. I may modify
my LV-40 so it more closely resembles the LV-200. They were written by
different people at ABI I am told and so the LV-200 looks quite different
from the LV-40.
Later,
Chris Scherrer
DNA Activity Leader
Nucleic Acid and Protein Facility
University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center
425 Henry Mall
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
608.263.9882(Voice) 608.265.6573(Fax)
http://www.biotech.wisc.edu <------------------------- Check it Out !!