Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 15:30:11 -0700 (MST)
From: "Terry Mulcahy 272-5792; fax 272-9107" <TMULCAHY@medusa.unm.edu>
Subject: DNA Synthsis
To: abrfhyp@cco.caltech.edu
Return-path: <rneves@gis.net>
Received: from home.gis.net (home.gis.net)
by MEDUSA.UNM.EDU (PMDF V5.0-5 #5028) id <01IB3S83D8ES007M7D@MEDUSA.UNM.EDU>
for TMULCAHY@MEDUSA.UNM.EDU; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 16:12:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rick ([206.42.65.81]) by home.gis.net (8.8.0/8.6.11)
with SMTP id SAA26375 for <TMULCAHY@medusa.unm.edu>; Sat,
26 Oct 1996 18:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by rick with Microsoft Mail id <01BBC369.1D1AD220@rick>; Sat,
26 Oct 1996 18:11:31 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 18:02:36 -0400
From: Rick Neves <rneves@gis.net>
Subject: Trityls Monitors
To: "'TMULCAHY@medusa.unm.edu'" <TMULCAHY@MEDUSA.UNM.EDU>
Message-id: <01BBC369.1D1AD220@rick>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sorry to hear your having so much trouble with your TM. I've had a lot of experience with TM's. Developing as well as using. The one sure thing I can say is they are VARIABLE. Especially instrument to instrument. Visible vs conductivity, doesn't seem to matter. You shouldn't expect to quantitate your results from a TM although its not a bad QA device at least to get a gross estimate as how well your instrument is working. Once you get use to how your TM reports a bad synthesis (bad determined by another methodology) as well as good, it will become useful.
R. S. Neves
Bioresin, Inc.
Check out Bioresin's Homepage: http://members.aol.com/bioresin
Check out My Homepage: http://www.gis.net/~rneves