Re: Which Procise?

Howard, Eric F (eric.f.howard@vanderbilt.edu)
Tue, 12 May 1998 12:08:20 -0600

It is worth it to go to the 4 cartridge procise. I have a two cart
system and find that it would be nice to be able to precycle another
filter after the runs. I have to spend extra time in the morning
waiting on the precycle, when I could be watching the current runs and
saving chemicals and customer's money if the sample does not sequence.

Looking back on our instrumentation grant we should have gone for the 4
cart.

Eric

On Fri, 08 May 1998 14:43:47 +0100 Bryan Dunbar <b.dunbar@abdn.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hello folks,
> we have a good chance of obtaining funds to replace one of
> our 9-year old 477a's with a Procise. I don't think the cLc is in the
> running because of having to go back to longer cycle times, but I would
> welcome opinions as to the relative merits of a 1, 2 or 4-cartridge
> model. Is it worth the extra money for the convenience of loading
> several samples at once? or am I missing something?.
> Regards from Scotland,
> Bryan.
> --
> <!DOCTYPE NETSCAPE-Addressbook-file-1>
>
> <!-- This is an automatically generated file.
>
> It will be read and overwritten.
>
> Do Not Edit! -->
>
> <TITLE>Bryan Dunbar's Address book</TITLE>
>
> <H1>Bryan Dunbar's Address book</H1>
>
>
> <DL><p>
>
> <DT><A HREF="mailto:tennie@chem.gla.ac.uk" NICKNAME="tennie">Tennie
> Videler</A>
>
> </DL><p>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Howard, Eric F
Vanderbilt University
Email: eric.f.howard@Vanderbilt.Edu