Re: Diferent recovery of Arg in sequences

SBAY (SBAY@novo.dk)
Fri, 29 May 1998 13:35:17 +0100

--IMA.Boundary.830644698
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

Susana

If I remember from an earlier question, you have a 477A. If you are getting
variations in the dry time after TFA cleavage, then you may get the variable Arg
that you are experiencing. With respect to your earlier question concerning 5
1/4 disks, have you considered acquiring the 610A data collection system - then
you will have fewer storage problems?

Best wishes

Stephen Bayne
_______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Diferent recovery of Arg in sequences
From: Susana Linskens <linskens@qb.ffyb.uba.ar> at Internet
Date: 26/05/1998 16:18

Dear all;
As always, I am looking for experience out there.
I am routinely control the first 15 AAs of a recombinant protein that has
Arg in position 4 and
position 10. It has a Cys in position 6 that normally is derivatized before,
with 4-vp. This protein has carbohydrates chains also, in several positions;
the closest, from the primary structure point of view, is in positon 36. In
the last runs, I observed that Arg 4 shows a very low recovery, much less
that I would expect and even less than Arg 10. I checked the sequence, on a
sample without derivatization of Cys but the situation is the same.
Does anybody have idea of a methodological reason of that?. Ssomething in
the protein itself that would explain that result?.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

Susana
Susana Linskens
LANAIS-PR0
Junin 956.
1113 Buenos Aires. ARGENTINA
linskens@qb.ffyb.uba.ar
FAX: University:54-1-963-9677
Private: 54-1-807-3235
Phione:University:54-1-961-9503
Private: 54-1-806-9989
********************************************

--IMA.Boundary.830644698
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers"

Received: from sentry.novo.dk (152.73.17.17) by ccintergate.novo.dk with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.11 Enterprise) id 00165026; Wed, 27 May 98 01:39:16
+0100
Received: from post.aecom.yu.edu by sentry.novo.dk;
(5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/28Sep94-0345PM)
id AA30567; Wed, 27 May 1998 01:31:26 +0200
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by post.aecom.yu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13284
for abrf-out; Tue, 26 May 1998 15:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from qb.ffyb.uba.ar (qb.ffyb.uba.ar [157.92.41.145])
by post.aecom.yu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA13274
for <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>; Tue, 26 May 1998 15:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from maq1 by qb.ffyb.uba.ar with smtp
(Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0yePEh-000tSlC; Tue, 26 May 98 16:18 GMT-0300
Message-Id: <m0yePEh-000tSlC@qb.ffyb.uba.ar>
Date: Tue, 26 May 98 16:18 GMT-0300
X-Sender: linskens@qb.ffyb.uba.ar
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-To: abrf@aecom.yu.edu
From: Susana Linskens <linskens@qb.ffyb.uba.ar>
Subject: Diferent recovery of Arg in sequences
To: Recipients of ABRF List <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
Sender: Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities
<abrf-request@aecom.yu.edu>
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: abrf-request@aecom.yu.edu

--IMA.Boundary.830644698--