Hello!
What I meant was, that the immunization had been carried out with the intact
protein (approx. 300 aa) and after the immunization several clones had been
selected for culturing. All epitopes I found during the experiments had been
located in the middle part of the protein (aa 70-150). There are further
regions with a predicted high antigenicity e.g. in the C-terminal part of the
protein, but I don't now if there were no antibodies produced against these
regions or if they only had not been selected for culturing. To clarify this
question a much larger number of antibody clones would have to be investigated
to carry out a mapping of the entire "antigenic surface" of the protein.
So, in conclusion, the epitope regions identified by epitope mapping with
antibodies raised by immunization with the intact (!) 300 aa protein correlate
with predicted regions of high antigenicity in the protein.
I hope that this will answer your question.
Sincerely yours,
Marcus Macht
-- * Marcus Macht, AG Przybylski, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Konstanz * Box M 732, 78457 Konstanz, Germany * Tel:++49-7531-883391 / Fax:++49-7531-883097 * Email: macht@sgiclu.chemie.uni-konstanz.de * URL: http://www.ag-przybylski.chemie.uni-konstanz.de/~macht