Rich Johnson
David Bostwick <david.bostwick@chemistry.gatech.edu> on 09/27/99 12:23:04 PM
To: Recipients of ABRF List <abrf@aecom.yu.edu>
cc: (bcc: Richard S. Johnson/ProteinChemistry/Immunex)
Subject: Re: MS (parent scans)
At 08:16 AM 9/27/1999 -0700, rjohnson@immunex.com wrote:
> Although I lack the experience, I can relate my understanding of the
>situation regarding the Micromass Qtof. A parent "scan" on a qtof is simply a
>series of daughter acquisitions (apologies to those who feel that equating CID
>fragment ions with girls, or that parents might give rise to girls, is
>sexist),
Many people are now using "precursor/product" instead of "parent/daughter,"
and "parent/product" is also used. The term "neutral loss" is apparently
non-offensive. I don't think there's a consensus for a term to replace
"granddaughter" for MS^3 scans, but I'm sure some people have ideas.
Shameless plug: Check out <http://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/stms> for
information on the Usenet newsgroup sci.techniques.mass-spec.